The Cask of Amontillado Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The Cask of Amontillado - Research Paper Example The story is about a love – hate relationship. In the story, the narrator is trying to portray the psychological complexities of these opposite emotion, emphasizing the way they enigmatically blend into each other. The story is about revenge, insult and death. Montresor loves himself and he cannot stand the insult by Fortunado; the self-love led Montresor to attempt murder. The death is ironic in the story as it is brought about by much desirable wine â€Å"Amontillado†. The wine enabled Montreso to entice Fortunado into death. Montreso persuades Fortunado into the dark recesses of the family catacombs and promises to offer a delicate wine. Here, the desire of wine led to the death of Fortunado.The title â€Å"The Cask of the Amontillado† of the story by Edgar Allan Poe has foreshadowing metaphor. The title of this grim story has an unusual ring to it. This is a strange title which we have not heard before. What does â€Å"Amontillado† literally mean? Actu ally, Amantillado is an alcoholic beverage something similar to Sherry. Only when people read the story they realize that it is a Spanish wine. Cask, by the way, is barrels in which wines are stored traditionally. Cask comes in many sizes. In the story, Montreso tells Fortunato, he has a â€Å"pipe of what passes for Amontillado†. In this context, â€Å"cask† also means â€Å"casket†. In the story, the Fortunado seeking a â€Å"cask of Amontillado† finds a â€Å"casket of death†.

(A) ETHICS AND (B) LEADERSHIP IN TEAMS Case Study

(A) ETHICS AND (B) LEADERSHIP IN TEAMS - Case Study Example Satisfying all stakeholders at the same time is practically impossible. Besides, the idea is not consistent with organizational goals and profitability. â€Å"By having â€Å"the right values† or being a person of â€Å"strong character,† the ethical leader can set the example for others and withstand any temptations that may occur along the way† (Freeman and Stewart, 2006, p. 2). 2. Leaders have to rely on subjective judgments in order to balance the interests and competing values. Although the principles of ethics outline the work concepts (Chapman, 2010), yet there is no well defined criteria of ethical considerations in decisions. Every stakeholder interprets ethics in such a way that it safeguards his interests. The subjectivity of judgments originates in lack of objectivity of ethical considerations. â€Å"We are rethinking how we lead, by placing less emphasis on carrots and sticks and more on inspiration, and putting humanity at the center of our organizations† (Seidman, 2010). All that is stipulated is laws and regulations that have to be respected while making decisions. Respecting the laws, all judgments that are made about accountability, rights, and social relationships have to be subjective. 3. Teamwork promotes learning more than individual work (Fleming, 2007). In this process, four fundamental stages apply. First is assessment, second is planning, third is execution, and fourth is analysis of outcome and modification. Whenever a team assembles for some task that is important for the achievement of organizational goals, the team conducts feasibility studies and assesses the positive and negative outcomes of the actions they are about to undertake. At this stage, there is a lot of subjectivity in the assessment of risks and opportunities because they are yet to materialize. This stage is followed by planning in which the leaders decide the course of action they would adopt in order to achieve the target. While planning,